On the criteria for the quality of psychological examination (based on the four discussion network platforms) or psychological “Ballet of Thrush” in six acts with epilogue
1. Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology of Southern Siberia
2. Novosibirsk state pedagogical university (Novosibirsk, Russia)
3. Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University (Ekaterinburg, Russia)
4. Center for Testing and Development "Humanitarian Technologies" (Moscow, Russia)
The article was prepared based on the analysis of the discussion by psychologists of the article in the "Psychological Newspaper" and the text of the examination conducted by psychologists. The authors agree that the text of the expert opinion does not hold water. In addition, the authors of the "expertise" violated certain procedural components that are significant during such a study. Based on the results of the discussion, options for technology expertise were proposed. One of the options recommended for use in expert studies on the psychological and linguistic assessment of the content of information provided by the media.
Keywords: forensic-psychological expertise, focus group, psycho-linguistic examination, the private opinion of a specialist, scientific discussion, psychological Merlezon ballet, «Comedy Woman»