Abstract:

The article is a discussion format in response to the “examination” of the work of rap artist Egor Kreed. In this revision (review) of the “examination”, the bias of the authors of the “examination” and their low professional competence will be perceived. Conclusions on the audit (review) of the “examination”: the authors of the “examination” do not own the subject of their research, their conclusions are biased and the charges are more like a political denunciation than an expert opinion. Examination of the creativity of a performer requires not only knowledge of the subject of research. In this case, the direction of pop art, but also certain professional knowledge in the field of mediapsychology, psychology of art, and psychoanalysis.

Keywords: Egor Kreed, neologisms, revision (review) of examination, examination, psychology